Top 5 ways to slash carbon emissions in the construction industry

Top 5 ways to slash carbon emissions in the construction industry

Advertisements

Top 5 ways to slash carbon emissions in the construction industry

As public concerns are mounting, governments are taking action, bringing in environmental targets designed to thwart runaway global warming, for the Certainty of hitting new temperature highs is nowadays unquestionable.

Globally, the sector contributes around 23% of air pollution, 40% of drinking water pollution, and 50% of all landfill wastes.

Meanwhile, the built environment as a whole is responsible for 30% of total global final energy consumption and 27% of total energy sector emissions, according to the IEA.

Populations around the world are already grappling with the impacts of climate crisis and environmental breakdown, from melting permafrosts and ice in the polar regions, to increases in extreme weather across the globe, creating greater risks of wildfires, floods and droughts while rising sea levels and worsening storms threaten coastal communities.

As public concerns are mounting, governments are taking action – bringing in environmental targets designed to thwart runaway global warming and help turn the tide on ecological destruction.

To stay ahead of the forces driving global business, construction firms must re-evaluate the pivotal role in how our species interacts with the planet.

Five key ways they can do this include:

1. Not building

Instead of resource-intensive new-builds, retrofitting existing building stock must play a much bigger role.

Last year the International Energy Agency called for 20 per cent of all existing building stock to be retrofitted by the year 2030 in order for the world to meet its climate targets, and said it should be a “key” focus of the construction industry’s decarbonisation efforts.

The organisation has called for an annual “deep renovation rate” of over 2% from now to 2030 and beyond.

2. Planning for long-term environmental gains

If new building works must go ahead they should start with a wholesale consideration of their form, function and impact on society, and how these impacts can be mitigated. This starts with planning.

Urban planners can make the built environment more environmentally friendly by adopting eco-friendly design approaches at an early stage.

This includes minimising land use, prioritising connections to public transport networks and walking and cycling routes to discourage private car use, and increasing access to green and blue spaces such as parks and bodies of water, which can enhance air quality, protect some natural resources and boost the health and well-being of the people in the environment.

Furthermore, the importance of implementing high Environmental Social Governance (ESG) standards within the industry is growing rapidly. As pressure for the construction industry to clean up its act grows, so too is the requirement for ESG standards, which should one day become a compulsory and universal system for evaluating the sustainability of both new developments and retrofitted buildings.

3.  Incorporating passive design and renewable energy

Passive design features combined with renewable energy can dramatically lower the carbon footprint of a completed building when it is in use.

This starts with selecting suitable building locations and orientations to make the best possible use of the natural environmental conditions.

Then, layout of rooms, window design, insulation, thermal mass, rain collection, shade and ventilation, all play significant roles in making a building as efficient as possible.

Passive House–certified homes use an estimated 80% less energy for heating and cooling than conventional buildings.

With the addition of solar panels or wind turbines for power generation and water heating, energy demands – and therefore environmental impacts – can be even lower. A new generation of photovoltaic solar-tiles promise even greater levels of flexibility and enhanced returns on investment.

Meanwhile, geothermal heat pumps and air-source heat pumps have enormous levels of efficiency in comparison to traditional gas boilers.

4. Cementing a concrete lead

Concrete is the most widely used man-made material in existence and is second only to water as the most-consumed resource on the planet.

Described as “the most destructive material on earth”, the production of cement, which is used to make concrete, is responsible for up to 8% of global CO2 emissions and would be the third largest carbon dioxide emitter in the world if listed as a country in its own right, causing up to 2.8bn tonnes of CO2 a year, surpassed only by China and the US.

Reduction in cement use is vital. This can be done by using recycled materials in the mix, reducing the amount of cement used, and using alternative materials such as fly ash or slag.

5. Choosing sustainable building materials

As well as reducing usage of concrete or mixing less damaging kinds of concrete, there are also various alternatives to concrete which take a much lower environmental toll on the planet. These include hempcrete, which is made from hemp plants mixed with a lime-based binder. This forms a lightweight, breathable construction material with excellent insulation properties.

Another alternative is rammed earth, which is made by compressing soil into a formwork. It is durable, low-maintenance, and has excellent thermal mass properties.

Other exciting modern breakthroughs in construction materials include straw bale construction, cross-laminated timber (CLT), and bamboo, all of which can often be produced with low impacts to the environment, and match existing construction materials for strength and practicality.

Conclusion

For companies to thrive and survive, embracing the health of our planet is a must. With the Cop28 summit in Dubai on the horizon, and the hosts warning that the IPCC has already “made it crystal clear that we are way off track”, the importance of adopting ambitious targets to achieve sustainable building has never been greater.

.

Time for universities to be ‘heroic’ on sustainability

Advertisements

Time for universities to be ‘heroic’ on sustainability, says Crow

Academy ‘at the heart’ of humanity’s failures to get to grips with scale of the issue, warns president of Arizona State University
Source: Stock

.

Universities must take “heroic action” to address the sustainability crisis after helping to lay its foundations by failing to take action sooner, Arizona State University president Michael Crow has claimed.

Speaking at Times Higher Education’s Global Sustainable Development Congress (GSDC), Professor Crow said universities had moved too slowly to address the problem.

He said the sustainability emergency – which the GSDC is meeting to discuss urgent solutions for – was caused by the relationship between the built environment and the natural systems on which we are dependent.

Professor Crow told delegates at the event in Saudi Arabia that sustainability was “critical to our success as a species”.

“We in academia have contributed mightily to the designed environment, and hold much of the responsibility for the lack of sustainability of that built environment and its increasing disruption of the natural environment,” he said.

Professor Crow warned that the world was entering an “unbelievably challenging moment where everything is accelerating”, and that there were many things higher education could have done already but had not.

The sector’s inability to be “more conscious of what we’re doing and how we’re doing it” helped lay the foundations for the sustainability crisis today, he said.

“A lot of groups have been responsible for our lack of sustainability, but at the heart of all of them has been the academy, [and] the universities,” he added.

“It’s time for universities to really step up for heroic action in the way that universities did around some other issues in the past.

“It’s time for new types of knowledge to be produced, new ways of thinking.”

Addressing the congress at King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) via video link, Professor Crow said trying to build alliances between universities was “nearly impossible”.

He called for universities to broaden the way they organised themselves because working in isolation would “not get us there quickly enough”.

The summit, held in the Middle East for the first time, is aiming to challenge the usual thinking on what higher education, with the support of governments, businesses and society, must do to help society meet the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

“It’s time for us to mount up, to begin working together, to begin aligning together, to begin working across institutions and across the world to take on this notion of global sustainable development,” added Professor Crow.

Also speaking at the summit, Tony Chan, president of KAUST, said the world was in a state of crisis that imperiled all of humanity, and universities across the globe should act with resolve.

“Our required response to the present crisis must be of a scale and sense of urgency akin to how we must respond to major world wars,” he said.

“Our universities must cease to be exemplars of unsustainable practices and we must become the transformative enablers of sustainability for others.”

Those outside higher education took their cue not just from what universities preached, but from what they practised, said Dr Chan.

“If academics are serious about tackling sustainability challenges, we can’t wait for the cavalry to show up,” he said. “We are the cavalry.”

.

.Read more on Times Higher Education

AI and Smart Cities–Improving Urban Life

Advertisements
AI and Smart Cities are they meant for Improving Urban Life?  Let us see what AI could bring to Smart Cities.
The image above is credit to World Economic Forum.
.

AI and Smart Cities–Improving Urban Life

By Ale Oluwatobi Emmanuel

The world as we have it today is not static. At the snap of a finger, there’s a new innovation in town that everyone makes a fuss about. Over the years and through generations, we’ve witnessed a series of disruptions in various sectors that have impacted our lives and activities.

You’d want to see what the first generation of computers in the 19th century looked like when they were invented. Take your time. They took up the size of an entire room.

Here is the question–who would have thought the same large computers could be compressed into smaller sizes? Today, with a size of 0.3 millimeters, the Michigan micro mote boasts of being the most miniature computer, and guess what? That’s a size smaller than a grain of rice.

What’s more? As humans, there is an exciting future ahead, and we’d have it with artificial intelligence at our beck and call. Recently, you’ve noticed how AI is disrupting virtually all sectors worldwide. Talk of banking, transportation, health, military, and even sports.

As we see with other sectors, our city centers are included in these disruptions, especially now that urban areas are getting more crowded and complex. It’s time to make our cities smart with AI.

What are smart cities, and how do we make our cities smart with this unique technology? There is no better time to have the discussion. Let’s dive in.

Smart Cities: What exactly are they?

If you’ve ever wondered–everyone is talking about smart cities, what’s the fuss about them? A city is smart if it incorporates technology and other digital solutions for its processes.

A smart city would utilize information and communication technologies to improve the quality of life of the citizens and the way the government serves the people.

It utilizes innovative technologies for a more interactive and responsive city administration, improved water supply, innovative urban transport networks, waste management, and many more.

A city is termed smart not by the number of smart technologies it’s got but by how it has effectively used these technologies to positively impact its citizens and drive economic growth.

Here is the catch– Artificial intelligence has a huge potential to access the activities of urban dwellers to bring about urban planning and management.

Talk of handling data from different sources to gain insights for effective municipal operations. Guess what? It also reduces associated expenses. Let’s assess some more use cases of AI in Smart cities.

Artificial Intelligence and Smart City Infrastructures

According to research conducted by the World Bank, 56% of the world’s population, which is about 4.4 billion people, live in cities. By 2050, this figure is expected to have doubled its current size.

At that point, 7 out of 10 people you meet would live in the city. Hence, there is a need to leverage artificial intelligence to enhance infrastructure and create more sustainable and livable urban environments.

For example, in public transit, cities with vast transit infrastructure have much to gain regarding making their processes seamless.

With the power of AI, commuters using major routes can offer real-time information through hands-on devices to communicate the situation of things on the road. This can enable other commuters to decide the ways they’d be taking faster.

As a case study, Dubai initiated a smart city project to monitor bus drivers’ condition, contributing to a 65% reduction in accidents caused by fatigue and stress.

In the same vein, AI can enhance the safety of power grids to improve performance management. Smart grids, such as generation plants, can be created backed by computer technology.

Moreso, prediction models can be set up on these grids to make smart meter readings of large quantities of data. They can also forecast the demand and price at given moments.

Artificial Intelligence and Smart City Services

Today, there is a need for cities around the world to provide improved delivery and quality of services through continuous monitoring of residents. For example, an AI-driven system in Los Angeles monitors air quality in real-time.

This system helps the city reduce air pollution and improve public health. It uses data from air quality sensors to prompt city officials about air pollution hotspots. It helps guide citizens to safe travel places.

Below are some other service sectors experiencing the disruptions of artificial intelligence.

  • Customer Service:

AI is disrupting customer service. Natural language processing (NLP) algorithms in chatbots are now available. The chatbots let customer support executives work effectively by getting information about customers’ issues.

So, it means if you own a business that relies majorly on customer service, you can hire an AI developer that can build chatbots to meet your specific business needs. Due to the accuracy of chatbots, there are speculations that they’d take over customer service roles, but only time will tell.

  • Health care:

In the healthcare service sector, introducing AI can bring about predictive healthcare. By leveraging predictive analytics, AI can help doctors make accurate decisions about the health of their patients. Asides from this, AI can also help streamline the analysis of scan results via image recognition. Doctors diagnose symptoms more accurately and effectively. With the rise of IoT-enabled embedded devices, they can remotely monitor their patient’s health conditions.

  • Banking:

AI is a valuable tool in a field such as the financial sector, which is prone to fraudulent activities. Artificial intelligence helps banks automate processes that are typically carried out by humans, reducing the time and effort it takes if done manually. Interestingly, AI can also help track customers’ credit history. AI’s predictive technology shows the likelihood of an individual not paying a loan back based on the information it analyzes.

That way, financial institutions and other loan services can streamline the process of getting new customers likely to repay their loans.

  • Transportation

Autonomous vehicles are here to stay, and they’re powered by AI. Who would have thought there’d be a time when cars could navigate their ways without human control? Well, it’s happening now. Kudos to Tesla and other big technology companies. Autonomous vehicles can also be used for deliveries and for transporting goods. Self-driving trucks can deliver packages more efficiently. We already see Tesla’s AI-powered Semi automobile do well in this regard.

Artificial Intelligence–The Tool for a Smarter World

No doubt, it is a visible phenomenon that the world of technology and innovation constantly changes. It’s exciting to let you know that we’re still at the early stage of the deployment of AI. Although we’ve seen its applications in diverse sectors, its long-term benefits will start unfolding. If you’re reading this now, you’re lucky. You must begin to adapt and position well for a new world driven by artificial intelligence.

Moving forward, a lot of changes will happen. From lifestyle changes to improvements in societal processes and operations. Welcome to the world of AI.

.

Read original TechDay article.

Limiting global warming to 1.5°C would save billions

Advertisements

Limiting global warming to 1.5°C would save billions from the dangerously hot climate, but not only that.  It could bring improvements to life with cleaner air and improved water and soil quality.  

.

The image above is on the many effects of dangerously high temperatures, including reduced crop yield. Credit Pablo Tosco / Oxfam International

Limiting global warming to 1.5°C would save billions from dangerously hot climate

 

Current climate policies will leave more than a fifth of humanity exposed to dangerously hot temperatures by 2100, new research suggests.

Despite the Paris Agreement pledge to keep global warming well below 2°C (compared to pre-industrial levels), current policies are projected to result in 2.7°C warming by the end of the century.

The new study, led by researchers at the Global Systems Institute, University of Exeter, associated with the Earth Commission, and Nanjing University, assessed what this would mean for the number of people living outside the “climate niche” in which our species has thrived.

It says about 60 million people are already exposed to dangerous heat (average temperature of 29°C or higher).

And two billion – 22% of the projected end-of-century population – would be exposed to this at 2.7°C of global warming.

The paper highlights the “huge potential” for decisive climate policy to limit the human costs and inequities of climate change.

Limiting warming to 1.5°C would leave 5% exposed – saving a sixth of humanity from dangerous heat compared to 2.7°C of warming.

The study also finds that the lifetime emissions of 3.5 average global citizens today – or just 1.2 US citizens – expose one future person to dangerous heat. This highlights the inequity of climate crisis, as these future heat-exposed people will live in places where emissions today are around half of the global average.

In “worst-case scenarios” of 3.6°C or even 4.4°C global warming, half of the world’s population could be left outside the climate niche, posing what the researchers call an “existential risk”.

“The costs of global warming are often expressed in financial terms, but our study highlights the phenomenal human cost of failing to tackle the climate emergency,” said Professor Tim Lenton, director of the Global Systems Institute at the University of Exeter.

“For every 0.1°C of warming above present levels, about 140 million more people will be exposed to dangerous heat.

“This reveals both the scale of the problem and the importance of decisive action to reduce carbon emissions.

“Limiting global warming to 1.5°C rather than 2.7°C would mean five times fewer people in 2100 being exposed to dangerous heat.”

Defining the niche

Human population density has historically peaked in places with an average temperature of about 13°C, with a secondary peak at about 27°C (monsoon climates, especially in South Asia).

Density of crops and livestock follow similar patterns, and wealth (measured by GDP) peaks at about 13°C.

Mortality increases at both higher and lower temperatures, supporting the idea of a human “niche”.

Although less than 1% of humanity currently live in places of dangerous heat exposure, the study shows climate change has already put 9% of the global population (more than 600 million people) outside the niche.

“Most of these people lived near the cooler 13°C peak of the niche and are now in the ‘middle ground’ between the two peaks. While not dangerously hot, these conditions tend to be much drier and have not historically supported dense human populations,” said Professor Chi Xu, of Nanjing University.

“Meanwhile, the vast majority of people set to be left outside the niche due to future warming will be exposed to dangerous heat.

“Such high temperatures have been linked to issues including increased mortality, decreased labour productivity, decreased cognitive performance, impaired learning, adverse pregnancy outcomes, decreased crop yield, increased conflict and infectious disease spread.”

While some cooler places may become more habitable due to climate change, population growth is projected to be highest in places at risk of dangerous heat, especially India and Nigeria.

The study also found:

  • Exposure to dangerous heat starts to increase dramatically at 1.2°C (just above current global warming) and increases by about 140 million for every 0.1°C of further warming.
  • Assuming a future population of 9.5 billion people, India would have the greatest population exposed at 2.7°C global warming – more than 600 million. At 1.5°C, this figure would be far lower, at about 90 million.
  • Nigeria would have the second-largest heat-exposed population at 2.7°C global warming, more than 300 million. At 1.5°C warming this would be less than 40 million.
  • India and Nigeria already show “hotspots” of dangerous temperatures.
  • At 2.7°C, almost 100% of some countries including Burkina Faso and Mali will be dangerously hot for humans. Brazil would have the largest land area exposed to dangerous heat, despite almost no area being exposed at 1.5 °C. Australia and India would also experience massive increases in area exposed.

The research team – which included the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, and the Universities of Washington, North Carolina State, Aarhus and Wageningen – stress that the worst of these impacts can be avoided by rapid action to cut greenhouse gas emissions.

Speaking about the conception of their idea, Professor Marten Scheffer, of Wageningen University, said: “We were triggered by the fact that the economic costs of carbon emissions hardly reflect the impact on human wellbeing.

“Our calculations now help bridging this gap and should stimulate asking new, unorthodox questions about justice.”

Ashish Ghadiali, of Exeter’s Global Systems Institute, said: “These new findings from the leading edge of Earth systems science underline the profoundly racialised nature of projected climate impacts and should inspire a policy sea-change in thinking around the urgency of decarbonisation efforts as well as in the value of massively up-shifting global investment into the frontlines of climate vulnerability.”

The research was funded by the Open Society Foundations and the paper is also an output of the Earth Commission – convened by Future Earth, the Earth Commission is the scientific cornerstone of the Global Commons Alliance.

Wendy Broadgate, Executive Director of the Earth Commission at Future Earth, said: “We are already seeing effects of dangerous heat levels on people in different parts of the world today. This will only accelerate unless we take immediate and decisive action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.”

Work on climate solutions by the Global Systems Institute at the University of Exeter has identified “positive tipping points” to accelerate action, including a recent report that highlighted three “super-leverage points” that could trigger a cascade of decarbonisation.

The paper, published in the journal Nature Sustainability, is entitled: “Quantifying the Human Cost of Global Warming.”

Read more on University of Exeter

 


Why Architectural Design is Most important in construction?

Advertisements

Why Architectural Design is Most important in the construction industry? Wondered rightly Diane Jones in West Seattle Blog.  Here is her answer.

The image above is just for representation and is credit to Gazette.One

 

Why Architectural Design is Most important in construction industry?

By dianejones, Participant

Architectural design is crucial in the construction industry for several reasons:

Functionality: Architectural design ensures that the building or structure is designed to serve its intended purpose effectively. It takes into account the needs and requirements of the users, incorporating various functional aspects such as spatial planning, circulation, and accessibility. A well-designed building enhances productivity, efficiency, and overall user experience.

Aesthetics: Architectural design adds visual appeal and beauty to a structure. It considers elements such as proportion, scale, balance, materials, colors, and textures to create a harmonious and visually pleasing environment. Aesthetically pleasing buildings not only enhance the quality of life for occupants but also contribute to the overall urban or rural landscape.

Safety and Structural Integrity: Architectural design plays a crucial role in ensuring the safety and structural integrity of a building. It takes into account factors such as load-bearing capacity, structural systems, resistance to natural forces (e.g., earthquakes, wind), fire safety, and adherence to building codes and regulations. Proper architectural design minimizes the risks associated with structural failures, accidents, and disasters.

Sustainability: With growing concerns about environmental impact and resource conservation, architectural design plays a vital role in promoting sustainability in the construction industry. Designers consider strategies for energy efficiency, water conservation, use of eco-friendly materials, waste reduction, and integration of renewable energy systems. Sustainable architectural design minimizes the ecological footprint of a building and contributes to a greener future.

Economic Considerations: Architectural design influences the economic aspects of a construction project. Effective design can optimize the use of space, reduce construction costs, and improve operational efficiency. It takes into account factors such as lifecycle costs, maintenance requirements, and adaptability to future needs. Well-designed buildings have the potential to increase property value and attract occupants, contributing to long-term economic viability.

Cultural and Social Context: Architectural design is influenced by the cultural and social context in which it is situated. It takes into account local traditions, cultural values, and community needs. Architecture can reflect and reinforce cultural identity, provide spaces for social interaction, and contribute to the overall well-being of communities.

In summary, architectural design is essential in the construction industry because it ensures functionality, aesthetics, safety, sustainability, economic viability, and cultural relevance in the built environment. It integrates various considerations to create well-designed and meaningful spaces that positively impact individuals, communities, and the environment.

.

.