AI is gobbling up water it cannot replace

AI is gobbling up water it cannot replace

.



.

AI is gobbling up water it cannot replace – I’m working on a solution

Muhammad Wakil Shahzad, Northumbria University, Newcastle

Data centres are the invisible engines of our digital world. Every Google search, Netflix stream, cloud-stored photo or ChatGPT response passes through banks of high-powered computers housed in giant facilities scattered across the globe.

These datacentres consume a staggering amount of electricity and increasingly, a surprising amount of water. But unlike the water you use at home, much of the water used in datacentres never returns to the water reuse cycle. This silent drain is drawing concern from environmental scientists. One preprint study (not yet reviewed by other scientists) from 2023 predicted that by 2027 global AI use could consume more water in a year than half of that used by the UK in the same time.

Datacentres typically contain thousands of servers, stacked and running 24/7. These machines generate immense heat, and if not properly cooled, can overheat and fail. This happened in 2022 when the UK endured a heatwave that saw temperatures reach a record-breaking 40° Celsius in some areas, which knocked off Google and Oracle datacentres in London.

To prevent this, datacentres rely heavily on cooling systems, and that’s where water comes in.

One of the most common methods for cooling datacentres involves mechanical chillers, which work like large fridges. These machines use a fluid called a refrigerant to carry heat away from the servers and release it through a condenser. A lot of water is lost as it turns into vapour during the cooling process, and it cannot be reused.

A 1 megawatt (MW) datacentre (that uses enough electricity to power 1,000 houses) can use up to 25.5 million litres annually. The total data centre capacity in the UK is estimated at approximately 1.6 gigawatts (GW). The global data centre capacity stands at around 59 GW.

Unlike water used in a dishwasher or a toilet, which often returns to a treatment facility to be recycled, the water in cooling systems literally vanishes into the air. It becomes water vapour and escapes into the atmosphere. This fundamental difference is why data centre water use is not comparable to that of typical household use, where water cycles back through municipal systems.

As moisture in the atmosphere that can return to the land as rain, the water datacentres use remains part of Earth’s water cycle – but not all rain water can be recovered.

The water is effectively lost to the local water balance, which is especially critical in drought-prone or water-scarce regions – where two-thirds of datacentres since 2022 have been built. The slow return of this water makes its use for cooling datacentres effectively non-renewable in the short term.

The rise of AI tools like ChatGPT, image generators and voice assistants has made datacentres work much harder. These systems need a lot more computing power, which creates more heat. To stay cool, data centres use more water than ever.

This growing demand is leading to a greater reliance on water-intensive cooling systems, driving up total water consumption even further. The International Energy Agency reported in April 2025 that datacentres now consume more than 560 billion litres of water annually, possibly rising to 1,200 billion litres a year by 2030.

What’s the alternative?

Another method, direct evaporative cooling, pulls hot air from datacentres and passes it through water-soaked pads. As the water evaporates, it cools the air, which is then sent back into server rooms.

While this method is energy-efficient, especially in warmer climates, the added moisture in the air can damage sensitive server equipment. This method requires additional systems to manage and control humidity, which necessitates more complex datacentre design.

My research team and I have developed another method which separates moist and dry air streams in datacentres with a thin aluminium foil, similar to kitchen foil. The hot, dry air passes close to the wet air stream, and heat is transferred through the foil without allowing any moisture to mix. This cools the server rooms in datacentres without adding humidity that could interfere with the equipment.

Trials of this method at Northumbria University’s datacentre have shown it can be more energy-efficient than conventional chillers, and use less water. Powered entirely by solar energy, the system operates without compressors or chemical refrigerants.

As AI continues to expand, the demand on datacentres is expected to skyrocket, along with their water use. We need a global shift in how we design, regulate and power digital infrastructure.


Don’t have time to read about climate change as much as you’d like?

Get a weekly roundup in your inbox instead. Every Wednesday, The Conversation’s environment editor writes Imagine, a short email that goes a little deeper into just one climate issue. Join the 45,000+ readers who’ve subscribed so far.The Conversation


Muhammad Wakil Shahzad, Associate Professor and Head of Subject, Mechanical and Construction Engineering, Northumbria University, Newcastle

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

The Conversation

Why low carbon concrete is not just an option

Why low carbon concrete is not just an option

.



.

Why low carbon concrete is not just an option but an imperative for infrastructure

The roar of construction is a sound that has long defined progress. From towering bridges to sprawling highways, concrete has been the bedrock of modern civilisation, literally shaping the world around us.

 

Why low carbon concrete is not just an option but an imperative for infrastructure Edelio-Bermejo-300x200.webp

Edelio Bermejo is head of group R&D and innovation at Holcim

Yet this very material, so fundamental to our advancement, has traditionally had a significant carbon footprint. As head of innovation at Holcim, I am witnessing firsthand a profound shift in how we build. The question is no longer if we can build low-carbon infrastructure, but when we can make it the universal standard.

The demand for infrastructure across the world continues to rise, driven by urbanisation and the critical need to upgrade ageing networks. This means there is a need to fundamentally transform not what we build but how we build, prioritising low carbon concrete solutions, especially for the robust, enduring infrastructure that defines our societies. Our goal is clear: to accelerate the transition to sustainable construction. This isn’t just about incremental improvements; it’s about a paradigm shift in material science.

Holcim dedicates over 80% of its R&D efforts to sustainable and circular solutions. One of the most exciting recent developments is the integration of biochar into concrete – a building material that actively removes carbon from the atmosphere. In collaboration with architect Alejandro Aravena and his firm Elemental, Holcim has unveiled biochar-based concrete, which transforms buildings into carbon sinks.

Biochar is a charcoal-like substance, produced by pyrolysis of organic matter. Instead of decomposing and releasing CO2, carbon is sequestered within the biochar, which then becomes an integral part of our low-carbon cement, mortars, and concrete. Each kilogram of biochar can prevent the release of up to three kilograms of CO2. This technology isn’t just for niche applications; it’s designed to be scalable and applicable across all project types, from housing prototypes to the very infrastructure that underpins our modern lives. The potential for roads, bridges and tunnels to become active carbon capture mechanisms is transformative.

We are currently trialling this innovation in a number of pilot projects; but beyond that, our commitment to low-carbon solutions is embedded across our material products. Our low-carbon concrete (ECOPact) and low-carbon cement range (ECOPlanet) are examples, delivering at least 30% lower carbon footprint while maintaining 100% performance. This is achieved through innovative formulations, including the use of calcined clay and recycled construction and demolition materials.

For infrastructure projects, where durability and performance are critical and volume of material used impacts the overall carbon footprint, low carbon solutions already provide the backbone for sustainable construction. For example, Bordeaux’s 549m long, 44m wide Simone Veil Bridge designed by global architecture practice OMA was made possible through a combination of advanced engineering, technical delivery, and 4,000t of our low carbon cement, which reduced the CO2 footprint of the concrete foundations by 50%. From foundations to massive structural components, the material can be easily integrated, pumped, and finished like conventional concrete, providing a transition to more sustainable building practices.

We’re also supporting Melbourne’s largest-ever road project: the North East Link, designed to close the gap in the city’s orbital freeway network and change the way people move, by supplying approximately 350,000 to 400,000 m³ of low-carbon concrete, including an advanced solution containing 80% supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) in non-structural applications. This accounts for nearly half of the project’s total 800,000 m³ required volume, and represents over 4,460 culverts for the 6.5km twin tunnels and related infrastructure. Each culvert incorporates 25% SMCs, reducing emissions without compromising strength.

Developing low-carbon materials is only one part of the equation; we must also embrace circularity within the construction industry. Concrete is infinitely recyclable. This is a powerful truth that we must fully harness. The linear “take, make, dispose” model is unsustainable and obsolete. Our focus must shift to a “reduce, recycle, regenerate” economy, where today’s waste becomes tomorrow’s valuable resource.

Last year, we incorporated 10.2M tonnes of construction and demolition materials (CDM) into new high-value building solutions. We are not just upcycling; we are truly closing the loop. With over 150 recycling ceres, strategically located near major metropolitan areas, we are transforming ‘urban mines’ into sources of raw materials. These products can contain anywhere from 10% to 100% recycled content, all while maintaining uncompromising quality and performance.

This significantly reduces the need for virgin aggregates and lessens the burden on landfills. It’s a win-win: preserving natural resources, reducing waste, and simultaneously cutting carbon emissions associated with material extraction and processing. The embodied carbon savings from recycling concrete can be substantial, preventing the need for new material production and its associated CO2 output. This is not just about environmental benefit; it’s about economic efficiency and resource security.

Undoubtedly there are challenges. Overcoming outdated building codes and industry norms, which often prioritise conventional materials, is a constant battle. We need governments and regulatory bodies to incentivise the adoption of low carbon and circular solutions, recognising their long-term value not just for the planet, but for the resilience and longevity of our infrastructure.

The future of construction must be sustainable. I am convinced that the path forward lies in radical innovation, a relentless pursuit of lower-carbon alternatives, and embracing circular economy principles. Solutions to decarbonise the industry are no longer futuristic concepts; they are here, ready to be deployed at scale.

  • Edelio Bermejo is head of group R&D and innovation at Holcim
**

Universities play a vital role in the SDGs

Universities play a vital role in the SDGs

Universities play a vital role in the SDGs, even in the poorest nations. A case in point is that of South Sudan.

.



.

Even in the poorest nations, universities play a vital role in the SDGs

Conflict, the climate crisis and poor infrastructure and funding mean pursuing the SDGs is a major challenge for South Sudan. But universities are still playing a positive role, especially when it comes to community engagement, say Kuyok Abol Kuyok and Tristan McCowan

June 6, 2025
Image Source: Luke Dray/Getty Images

Since South Sudan attained independence in 2011, the country’s socio-economic development has been impeded by a combination of internal conflicts, the ongoing civil war in Sudan and incessant climatic disasters, particularly flooding, that have internally displaced nearly 2 million people and severely deteriorated the quality of life for the entire population.

report by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) indicates that the East African nation has a Human Development Index score of 0.381 for 2022, the second lowest in the world after Somalia (0.38). Furthermore, while South Sudan is a signatory to the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the report suggests that the nation was experiencing challenges in tackling 13 of the 17 SDGs, with improvements being made only in three: gender equality (SDG 5)responsible consumption and production (SDG 12) and climate action (SDG 13).

It is in this context that researchers from the University of Juba and UCL conducted an exploratory study in South Sudan, aimed at both highlighting the role of higher education institutions in achieving the SDGs in the country, and identifying areas in need of attention.

The research, which was carried out from September 2023 to July 2024 with funding from UCL’s Global Engagement Funds, indicates that, despite the economic problems posed by the conflict in Sudan, South Sudan’s higher education institutions have broad potential to contribute to fostering all aspects of development and each of the 17 SDGs. Yet, in practice, the main focus of university programmes was on the basic human needs of poverty (SDG 1)hunger (SDG 2)health (SDG 3) and education (SDG 4), along with gender equality (SDG 5) and peace, justice and strong institutions (SDG 16) – with the last reflecting the prevalence of conflict in the country.

Notable here is the lack of emphasis on goals relating to the natural environment. However, there is a particularly strong focus on agriculture and rural development among applied and vocational courses at public universities; the private sector, meanwhile, tends to focus more on business-related courses and theology.

Owing to the turbulent history of the country and higher education institutions, the learning environment is challenging for students. There is a lack of adequate teaching infrastructure, including classrooms, library facilities and the internet, and there are instances of overcrowding. Students seldom receive direct teaching about the SDGs, but the higher education sector offers a broad range of courses for students to develop professional competence in areas that are relevant to the global goals, while university campuses are seen to promote values of unity, tolerance and respect.

Research on the SDGs is also a challenge. Lack of funding and staff time means that research is carried out only in a small number of institutions, mainly at the University of Juba, South Sudan’s oldest and most prestigious institution. But, even here, a shortage of local journals that prioritise nationally relevant issues is an obstacle for researchers.

A senior university leader summed up the difficulty in prioritising academic research: “There’s a Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. People are still struggling with the basics…people have gone five months without a salary. So you cannot really put pressure on anybody to do research.”

Nevertheless, our study shows that universities displayed a universally strong commitment to community engagement, with awareness of the critical challenges facing local communities and their responsibility for supporting them. In 2020, for instance, the University of Juba’s Institute of Peace, Development and Strategic Studies, in collaboration with the Sudd Institute, formed the South Sudan National Dialogue Secretariat, which attempted to resolve political problems in the country.

Universities are also active in engaging with communities through agricultural extension and other rural development work, which often generates mutual benefits. Students, in particular, spend substantial amounts of time with communities through their course fieldwork.

There is no doubt that the role of universities in South Sudan in fostering the SDGs is restricted by various factors, such as poor infrastructure, exacerbated by institutional displacement owing to conflict. Three of the public universities – Juba, Upper Nile and John Garang – have been displaced at some point, or continue to be displaced, since they were founded in the 1980s. Upper Nile University, for example, moved from Malakal to Juba in 2014 after being partially destroyed during the 2013 conflict. Environmental threats, especially flooding, also pose serious hazards for universities.

However, overall, our study finds that while the quality of education and research is held back by lack of infrastructure and funding, universities still play a very positive role in relation to peace-building and mutual understanding between ethnic groups. Universities also display strong commitment to achieving local and national development goals and solidarity with local communities, with important impacts on nutrition, health and school education.

Kuyok Abol Kuyok is an adjunct associate professor at the University of Juba, South Sudan. Tristan McCowan is a professor of international education at UCL.

The Times Higher Education Impact Rankings 2025 will be published in late June. 

*

Community-led Climate Actions to Boost Resilience in Jordan

Community-led Climate Actions to Boost Resilience in Jordan

.



.

Community-led Climate Actions to Boost Resilience in Jordan

05 June 2025

 

Trump’s Middle East pivot aims to counter China’s rising influence

Trump’s Middle East pivot aims to counter China’s rising influence

.

Image: A street decorated with the flags of Saudi Arabia and the US ahead of Trump’s visit. Ali Haider / EPA

.



.

Trump’s Middle East pivot aims to counter China’s rising influence

Maria Papageorgiou, Newcastle University

The US president, Donald Trump, claimed he was able to secure deals totalling more than US$2 trillion (£1.5 trillion) for the US on his tour of the Gulf states in May. Trump said “there has never been anything like” the amount of jobs and money these agreements will bring to the US.

However, providing a lift for the US economy wasn’t the only thing on Trump’s mind. China’s influence in the wider Middle East region is growing fast – so much so that it was even able to mediate a detente between bitter regional rivals Saudi Arabia and Iran in 2023.

Trump’s attempt to strengthen ties with countries in the Middle East is probably also a deliberate attempt to contain China’s growing regional ambitions.

China has spent the past two decades building up its economic and political relations with the Middle East. In 2020, it replaced the EU as the largest trading partner to the Gulf Cooperation Council, which includes Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Bilateral trade between them was valued at over US$161 billion (£119 billion).


Get your news from actual experts, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter to receive all The Conversation UK’s latest coverage of news and research, from politics and business to the arts and sciences.


The Middle East has also become an important partner to China’s sprawling Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Massive infrastructure projects in the region, such as high-speed railway lines in Saudi Arabia, have provided lucrative opportunities for Chinese companies.

The total value of Chinese construction and investment deals in the Middle East reached US$39 billion in 2024, the most of any region in the world. That year, the three countries with the highest volume of BRI-related construction contracts and investment were all in the Middle East: Saudi Arabia, Iraq and the UAE.

China has also strengthened its financial cooperation with Middle Eastern countries, particularly the UAE and Saudi Arabia. As part of China’s efforts to reduce global reliance on the US dollar for trade, it has arranged cross-border trade settlements, currency swap agreements, and is engaging in digital currency collaboration initiatives with these countries.

American security guarantees have historically fostered an alignment between the Gulf states and the west. The string of agreements Trump signed with countries there reflects an attempt to draw them away from China and back towards Washington’s orbit.

Countering China

One of the more significant developments from Trump’s trip was an agreement to deepen US technological cooperation with the UAE, Saudi Arabia and Qatar. The US and UAE announced they would work together to construct the largest AI data centre outside of the US in Abu Dhabi.

Technology is one of the key areas where China has been trying to assert its influence in the region. Through Beijing’s so-called “Digital Silk Road” initiative, which aims to develop a global digital ecosystem with China at its centre, Chinese firms have secured deals with Middle Eastern countries to provide 5G mobile network technology.

Chinese tech giants Huawei and Alibaba are also in the process of signing partnerships with telecommunications providers in the region for collaboration and research in cloud computing. These companies have gained traction by aligning closely with national government priorities, such as Saudi Arabia’s initiative to diversify its economy through tech development.

American companies, including Amazon, Microsoft and Google, have spent years building regional tech ecosystems across the Gulf. Trump is looking to recover this momentum. He was joined in the Middle East by more than 30 leaders of top American companies, who also secured commercial deals with their peers from the Gulf.

US quantum computing company Quantinuum and Qatari investment firm Al Rabban Capital finalised a joint venture worth up to a US$1 billion. The agreement will see investment in quantum technologies and workforce development in the US and Qatar.

There are two other areas where Trump is trying to cut China off. American companies and Abu Dhabi’s state-run oil firm agreed a US$60 billion energy partnership. China is heavily dependent on the Middle East for energy, with almost half of the oil it uses coming from the region. Greater alignment with the US could hamper Beijing’s ability to secure the resources it needs.

Trump also signed a raft of defence deals with Qatar and Saudi Arabia. These included a US$1 billion deal for Qatar to acquire drone defence technology from American aerospace conglomerate Raytheon RTX, and a US$142 billion agreement for the Saudis to buy military equipment from US firms.

These moves underscore Washington’s intention to limit China’s influence in key defence sectors. China is a key player in the global market for commercial and military drones, providing Saudi Arabia and the UAE with a large share of their combat drones.

One final aspect of Trump’s trip was his brief meeting with Syria’s interim president Ahmed al-Sharaa. Trump signalled possible sanctions relief, which has since come into effect. This constituted more than a diplomatic thaw.
With China positioning itself as a regional mediator and Russia struggling with a diminished role following the fall of Bashar al-Assad in Syria, the US is looking to reassert itself as the primary power broker in the region.The Conversation
Maria Papageorgiou, Leverhulme Early Career Researcher, School of Geography, Politics, and Sociology, Newcastle University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
The Conversation