The Intelligent Built Environment and Future Trends

The Intelligent Built Environment and Future Trends

A breathtaking cityscape with illuminated skyscrapers and vibrant urban lights during the night. by Zhou Shen via Pexels

.

The Intelligent Built Environment

.

MEConstructionNews  –  5 November 2026

.

The Intelligent Built Environment and Future Trends

.The Middle East’s built environment is undergoing a significant transformation as artificial intelligence (AI), Building Information Modelling (BIM), digital twins and other advanced technologies become increasingly integrated into the real estate lifecycle. From optimising construction schedules to improving building performance and enabling more informed investment decisions, these tools are changing not only how projects are delivered, but also how assets are operated and maintained over time.

For JLL, one of the most important developments is the ability to make better-informed decisions earlier in the process, when changes can be made more easily and their implications assessed before significant capital is committed.

“The biggest change is when decisions get made. In planning and design, AI lets teams test many layouts and servicing strategies against cost, carbon and operational criteria before a client commits capital,” says Dr. Matthew Marson, Managing Director, EMEA & APAC – Technology Consulting at JLL.

The impact is particularly tangible during construction, where project teams must coordinate multiple work packages, resources and suppliers while responding to changing conditions. Marson points to ALICE Technologies, a company in JLL Spark’s venture portfolio, which uses AI to generate and compare alternative construction sequences from the same project data.

“It varies skills, equipment, phasing and methods to find the plan that best balances time, cost and risk,” he explains. “A planner traditionally builds one schedule and then defends it. With ALICE, the team can test what happens if a second tower crane arrives, a delivery slips or a zone opens early, before committing to a plan.”

This ability to test different scenarios enables teams to assess the implications of potential disruptions before they occur. When site conditions change, schedules can be re-optimised rather than rebuilt from scratch. On complex projects with numerous packages running in parallel, this means risk becomes something teams can plan around instead of simply reacting to, he says.

Rachael Jones, Head of Specialist Services, KSA – Project & Development Services at JLL, highlights a practical example from a giga-project in which JLL is involved.

“When a key supplier reported a multi-week shipping delay for specialised components, the project team input the new timeline constraint into the AI platform, which processed the downstream impacts and generated an optimised revised schedule within hours,” she explains.

“The system re-sequenced tasks, adjusted resource allocations, and updated supply chain schedules to minimise disruption – enabling the team to maintain project momentum through a fast, data-driven response,” Jones adds.

While BIM has been widely adopted across design and construction, its potential to support building operations remains underexploited. Models are often developed to coordinate the construction process, only for much of their value to be lost when an asset is handed over to its operator.

“BIM was built to coordinate design and construction, and on most projects its value ends there. The model is handed over, the operator receives files they never asked for, and the building is run from spreadsheets,” says Marson.

JLL’s focus, he explains, is on closing that gap by defining operational requirements before design begins. These may include asset registers, maintenance requirements, spatial data and other information needed to manage the building effectively.

“The model is then built for operations rather than adapted to them later, with more cost,” he says.

When BIM data is connected to live feeds from building management systems, IoT sensors and work order histories, AI can analyse building performance and identify opportunities for intervention.

“It can spot equipment drifting out of performance, link a comfort complaint to a specific plant item, or forecast which assets are likely to fail first. The model becomes the spatial index that gives operational data its context. Without that structure, AI is guessing. With it, facilities teams can act on evidence,” Marson explains.

The approach is particularly relevant to the Middle East, where the scale of new developments creates opportunities to embed digital infrastructure and consistent data standards from the outset.

Technologies shaping the next decade

Beyond BIM and AI, Marson identifies digital twins, robotics, automation and computer vision as technologies likely to have a substantial impact on the region’s built environment over the next 5 to 10 years.

“Three stand out,” he says. “The first is digital twins, used as operational tools that combine live building data with a structured model of the asset rather than as 3D visualisations.”

With entire districts and cities being developed across the region, he believes there is a rare opportunity to establish the right data architecture from day one. “The region is building whole districts and cities from scratch. That is a rare chance to design the data architecture in from day one instead of trying to fix it later. Combine it with processes and you’ve got a city-wide operating system,” he explains.

The second major opportunity is robotics and automation in building operations. Cleaning, security, inspection and logistics remain labour-intensive activities across large estates, and greater automation could improve efficiency and consistency.

“Buildings will increasingly need to be designed for robots as well as people, from lift integration to floor finishes and connectivity,” Marson says.

Computer vision is the third area he highlights, particularly its potential to turn existing cameras into sensors for occupancy, site safety and asset condition. IoT will underpin many of these applications, but Marson stresses that interoperability will be just as important as the technologies themselves.

“The technology that will matter most, though, is the least glamorous –  common data standards will let these systems talk to each other,” he says.

Jones agrees that connected information is becoming increasingly important as projects grow more complex and delivery pressures intensify.

“While the industry increasingly recognises the importance of becoming more data-driven and connected, levels of data maturity still vary across organisations and projects,” she says.

The Intelligent Built Environment and Future Trends

This creates challenges when information is spread across different systems, teams and supply chains. In an environment characterised by supply chain disruption, cost volatility and programme pressures, the ability to access reliable information and respond quickly can make a significant difference.

“As projects become more complex and interconnected, the focus is shifting from simply collecting data to creating reliable, standardised and connected information that enables better coordination, stronger forecasting and more informed decision-making across the full asset lifecycle,” Jones explains.

Better decisions from the outset

AI and advanced modelling can also help clients evaluate development options earlier, when design decisions have the greatest influence on cost, programme and
long-term performance.

“The cost of changing a decision rises sharply as a project progresses. Yet the information needed to make good decisions has traditionally arrived late. AI and parametric modelling reverse that,” Marson says.

At concept stage, teams can test options against capital cost, programme, energy performance and operating cost simultaneously, rather than optimising one variable and discovering the consequences for others later.

“A façade choice, for example, can be assessed for its effect on cooling loads, maintenance access and replacement cycles before it is drawn in detail,” he explains.

This is especially important in the Gulf, where cooling requirements have a significant influence on operational costs and carbon emissions. The emphasis must therefore extend beyond construction expenditure to the long-term cost of owning and operating an asset.

“For clients, the question shifts from ‘what will this cost to build?’ to ‘what will this cost to own over its life?’” Marson says. “Whole-life asset value is largely decided by a few early choices. Modelling makes those choices visible, comparable and defensible to decision makers.”

Digital twins offer another opportunity to connect design and construction information with the operational phase, but Marson believes their success depends on whether they answer practical questions for building owners and operators.

“The greatest practical value is in operations, where most of a building’s lifetime cost sits,” he says.

A useful twin answers operational questions. Which assets are underperforming? What will a failure affect? How is space actually being used? What will a change in operating strategy do to energy and comfort?”

The value diminishes, however, when digital twins are developed primarily as visual showcases without being connected to live building systems.

“On readiness, the Middle East is ahead of most regions in ambition but further from routine use than many expect. Many flagship developments include digital twins in their brief. The constraint is rarely the technology. It is information requirements that aren’t defined early, handover data that arrives incomplete, and operators who weren’t involved in specifying what they need,” Marson explains.

To move from isolated implementations to routine use, digital twins must be embedded in project requirements, supported by complete handover information and assigned to an accountable business owner.

“Routine use will come when twins are written into contracts as an operational requirement with a named business owner, rather than a bonus, ‘digital extra’,” he adds.

Managing complexity through collaboration

The scale and pace of development across the Middle East make coordination between owners, consultants, contractors, operators and other stakeholders increasingly important.

“Speed and complexity make a familiar problem worse … too many parties working from different versions of the truth,” Marson states.

He believes a common data environment, supported by clear rules governing information ownership, approval and exchange, is essential. Integrated dashboards can provide owners with a consolidated view of cost, programme and risk, while AI can analyse large volumes of project correspondence and change requests to identify emerging problems.

Bringing operators into the design process is equally important, helping teams avoid costly changes when operational requirements are only recognised at handover.

“The most effective tool needs to go beyond just a single piece of software. A common data environment with clear rules about who owns which information, when it is approved and how it flows between parties is key to project success,” shares Marson.

The challenge extends across the entire asset lifecycle. Design information does not always reflect what was built, construction records may arrive in formats operators cannot use, and systems from different vendors often require bespoke integration.

“The industry’s data problem is less about volume and more about continuity,” he states.

Although standards such as ISO 19650, the open IFC model format and Brick for building systems data provide a foundation, adoption remains uneven. Marson believes information management must be treated as a means of creating value rather than simply satisfying compliance requirements.

“The underlying issue is ownership,” mentions Marson. “Data quality improves when someone is accountable for it across the whole lifecycle, and when contracts specify information requirements as clearly as they specify materials.”

For all the potential benefits, adopting technology does not automatically deliver improved productivity or financial returns. Marson argues that organisations must first establish the business outcomes they want to achieve and how these will be measured.

“A gap usually exists because technology is bought as a product rather than introduced as a change to how work is done,” he says.

JLL’s approach begins by identifying the decision, cost or risk that a technology is expected to change, establishing a baseline and assigning responsibility for measuring the result.

“We track a small set of operational measures and link them to financial outcomes the client already recognises,” Marson says.

These include the ratio of reactive to planned maintenance, energy intensity, time spent on reporting and space utilisation. The clearest measurable benefits are currently emerging in building operations, particularly through energy optimisation, predictive maintenance and the automation of reporting and document review.

“Benefits in design and delivery are real but harder to isolate, because a problem avoided has been successfully avoided and you can’t prove what didn’t happen,” he comments.

The Intelligent Built Environment and Future Trends

Evolving skills and the intelligent asset

As AI takes over more routine analysis and administrative tasks, professional roles across the built environment will increasingly focus on judgement, interpretation and decision-making.

“Automation will take over much of the work professionals least enjoy, compiling reports, checking documents and reconciling data from different systems,” Marson says. “What remains is the work that needs judgement, which is where their value lies.”

Architects and engineers will spend more time evaluating options, project managers will be able to act earlier on emerging risks, and facilities teams will need to manage building systems and data alongside contractors. Real estate professionals will increasingly use portfolio information to inform investment decisions.

“The new skill all of these roles need is data literacy – knowing what good data looks like and where AI can and can’t be relied on,” he explains.

Looking towards 2030, Marson anticipates buildings with digital services will be accessed through conversational interfaces and connected devices help systems respond more intuitively to occupants’ needs.

“The intelligent buildings of 2030 will have captured the advantages they afford to owners, operators and occupants by building on industry expected devices, connectivity, applications and governance procedures,” he states.

He expects mobile applications to evolve towards text- and voice-based interaction, while connected devices such as watches, phones and rings could help link people’s needs with their location. As AI becomes better at interpreting information and context, the distinction between a conventional building and an intelligent one may eventually disappear.

“In fact, we’ll stop calling them intelligent buildings as we expect their capability as standard,” he says.

The Middle East has the ambition and investment to lead this transition, but achieving it will require more than adopting the latest technologies. Consistent data standards, reliable information, clear governance and investment in professional skills will be essential to ensuring that digital innovation translates into measurable value.

“The Middle East has the ambition and the investment to set the pace. The technology is ready, and the industry’s habits need to catch up,” Marson concludes.

.

.


 

.

Türkiye’s COP 31 Targets a More Sustainable Built Future

Türkiye’s COP 31 Targets a More Sustainable Built Future

Expansive aerial view showcasing the dense urban landscape and architecture of İzmir, Türkiye. by Doğan Alpaslan Demir via Pexels

.

COP31: Türkiye Targets a More Sustainable Built Environment

.

Ahead of COP31, Türkiye has launched the Antalya Compact for Energy Efficient Buildings to accelerate building decarbonisation and promote more sustainable buildings. Credit: “COP31 Press Conference_12Feb26_COP31 Presidency21” by UNclimatechange, CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

.

COP31 President-designate Murat Kurum says the Antalya Compact framework signals a shift from “ambition to implementation” of efficient building practices

Decarbonising the global building stock is central to reducing global emissions. From the carbon emissions associated with construction to the resilience of homes, schools and hospitals in a changing climate, the decisions made today will shape communities and the built environment for generations.

Ahead of COP31 in Antalya, Türkiye, the conference presidency is seeking to accelerate building decarbonisation progress with the launch of the Antalya Compact for Energy Efficient Buildings.

The framework aims to help governments and industry reduce emissions from the built environment while improving the quality, affordability and resilience of buildings worldwide.

Open for endorsement by all participating countries, the Compact advances two of COP31’s Global Targets for 2035: reducing the operational energy intensity of the global building stock by at least 25% against 2020 levels, and accelerating efficient electrification as part of an ambition to increase electricity’s share of global energy consumption to 35%.

Murat Kurum, COP31 President-Designate and Minister of Environment, Urbanisation and Climate Change for the Republic of Türkiye. Credit: Wikimedia Commons

Developed under Türkiye’s COP31 Presidency, with support from the secretariat of the UN Environment Programme-hosted Global Alliance for Buildings and Construction (GlobalABC), the framework outlines a common approach for governments, cities, financial institutions and buildings-sector stakeholders.

“Buildings are at the heart of our cities and of the energy transition,” says COP31 President-Designate Murat Kurum, Minister of Environment, Urbanisation and Climate Change for the Republic of Türkiye.

“With the Antalya Compact, we are moving from ambition to implementation – accelerating practical action to make buildings more efficient, resilient and sustainable around the world.”

COP31: Key Sustainability Targets
  • 35% – Target share of global final energy consumption to be met by electricity by 2035.
  • 50% – Reduction in the projected growth of global municipal solid waste targeted by 2035.
  • 25% – Target reduction in building-sector energy intensity by 2035, compared with 2020 levels.
  • 15% – Minimum global circular material use rate targeted for 2035 to advance green industrialisation.
  • 9–20 November 2026 – Dates of COP31, taking place in Antalya, Türkiye, with a focus on accelerating climate action and implementing existing commitments.

Tackling the built environment’s carbon footprint

According to the UN Environment Programme’s (UNEP) ‘Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction 2025–2026’, buildings account for nearly 40% of energy-related carbon emissions and energy demand.

Meanwhile, the global building footprint continues to expand. In 2024, total building floor area increased by 1.7%, reaching 272 billion square metres.

This growth makes the sustainability of both new construction and existing buildings increasingly important. Improving the environmental performance of new developments avoids locking in emissions for decades, while renovating existing properties offers opportunities to reduce resource consumption and improve comfort.

The investment challenge also remains substantial, with UNEP estimating that an additional US$3.6tn in cumulative energy efficiency investment is needed by 2030 to align investment levels with the 2050 net-zero pathway.

Martin Krause, Director of the Climate Change Division at UNEP. Credit: UNEP

In the report’s foreword, Martin Krause, Director of UNEP’s Climate Change Division, writes: “Over the past decade, global building floor area has expanded rapidly, while energy demand and emissions have grown more slowly. Energy efficiency, cleaner power and better design have delivered tangible progress.”

Despite highlighting that building decarbonisation is failing to keep pace with construction rates, he suggests that the efficiency gains recorded “show that the sector can grow while reducing its climate impact and that policies, markets and technology can align.”

He also argues that buildings should be viewed as an opportunity to deliver wider social and environmental benefits, from meeting housing needs and reducing costs to strengthening resilience against climate extremes and supporting inclusive economic growth.

“Energy efficiency, cleaner power and better design have delivered tangible progress. ”
Martin KrauseDirector of UNEP’s Climate Change Division

Six priorities for sustainable buildings

The Antalya Compact identifies six areas for action, giving countries a framework to integrate building sustainability into their climate and development strategies.

These include strengthening the environmental performance of new and existing buildings, accelerating renovation, reducing energy demand, expanding electrification and improving building flexibility. The framework also calls for greater investment and capacity to support implementation at scale.

In practice, this could mean stronger building standards, renovation programmes and investment in social housing, schools, hospitals and other public infrastructure.

Electrifying heating, cooling and cooking also reduces reliance on fossil fuels, particularly as electricity generation becomes cleaner.

 

The Compact recognises that countries will follow different pathways according to their national circumstances, starting points and resources. Its six action areas are intended to provide a shared direction while allowing flexibility in implementation.

The framework builds on the Déclaration de Chaillot, endorsed by more than 70 countries in 2024, which called for a rapid, fair and effective transition towards near-zero-emission and resilient buildings.

The Intergovernmental Council for Buildings and Climate was subsequently established at COP29 in Baku, Azerbaijan, to strengthen international cooperation and support implementation.

For Yves-Laurent Sapoval, co-chair of GlobalABC, the transition must deliver benefits that extend beyond emissions reductions.

“Half of the buildings that will exist in 2050 have yet to be built and most existing buildings need to be renovated,” he says. “The choices we make today will shape our cities and communities for decades to come.”

Yves-Laurent Sapoval, co-chair of the Global Alliance for Buildings and Construction. Credit: LinkedIn

He adds that sustainable buildings should also provide “homes people can afford to heat and cool, schools where children can learn comfortably, and hospitals that can deliver essential services without wasting energy”.

From commitments to implementation

The Antalya Compact provides a framework for turning international climate ambitions into practical action across the construction and property sectors. I

ts success, however, will depend on countries translating commitments into effective policies, renovation programmes and investment.

The COP31 Presidency is encouraging governments and stakeholders to endorse the Compact, with the Intergovernmental Council for Buildings and Climate’s ministerial meeting on 12 November offering a further opportunity to build momentum.

COP31 – key partners

United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)

Executive Director: Inger Andersen | HQ: Nairobi, Kenya

UNEP is the UN’s leading environmental authority and a key source of research and policy guidance on climate change. Through GlobalABC, it helps coordinate international action on building decarbonisation, energy efficiency and climate resilience. Its Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction provides essential evidence on the sector’s emissions, energy demand and investment needs, making it particularly relevant to the article.

UN-Habitat

Executive Director: Anacláudia Rossbach | HQ: Nairobi, Kenya

UN-Habitat works with governments and local authorities to promote sustainable urban development, adequate housing and resilient communities. At COP31, it is co-hosting the Resilient Cities, Buildings and Cooling Pavilion alongside GlobalABC, the Cool Coalition and Türkiye’s İLBANK. Its work connects building efficiency with urban planning, sustainable cooling and climate-resilient housing.

.

 


 

.

What is Artificial General Intelligence Explained Simply

What is Artificial General Intelligence Explained Simply

Close-up of AI-assisted coding with menu options for debugging and problem-solving. by Daniil Komov via Pexels

.

What is artificial general intelligence – and is it already here?

.

Waqas Ali, University of Wolverhampton

.

OpenAI’s president, Greg Brockman, recently suggested that its advanced model, known as GPT-6 Astra, could mark the arrival of something called artificial general intelligence, or AGI.

If AI itself is often defined as the ability to simulate human intelligence, OpenAI defines AGI as an AI system that outperforms humans at most economically valuable work – to be better at the majority of digital and cognitive tasks a human can perform. This includes tasks such as writing computer code, organisational activities or managing projects.

For now, at least, it excludes work that involves physical labour, such as agriculture or construction. Though the integration of AI with robotics means such sectors of industry may not be the exclusive domain of humans forever.

This definition by OpenAI focuses on breadth of competency by an AI system. However, other experts maintain that AGI will be characterised by additional cognitive leaps beyond present-day AI models. For example, Demis Hassabis, founder of Google DeepMind, has said that AGI should be able to do “pretty much any cognitive task that humans can do”.

This definition makes AGI more about brilliance and a bit less about depth. Yann LeCun, former chief AI scientist at Meta, believes the term AGI itself is flawed and should be replaced by “human-level AI”.

These represent snapshots from a vigorous ongoing debate over when AGI will arrive and how to recognise it.

Venturebeat magazine reported Brockman acknowledging this at a closed press briefing about GPT-6 Astra in September when he said: “When we started OpenAI, we kind of thought that there was going to be this well-defined moment that everyone would recognise … it hasn’t played out like that.”

But he added: “For me personally, I do think we’re there.” Just a few days after Brockman made his comments, the chief executive of Anthropic, Dario Amodei, called in an essay titled: “We must pace the frontier” for the AI industry to slow down the pace of its development. Within hours of this essay being published, both Sam Altman and Elon Musk signalled their agreement.

So is Brockman right about AGI being here? The evidence still points in more than one direction and is therefore inconclusive.

The clearest shift with GPT-6 Astra is in how people use it. Earlier models needed detailed instructions at each step. Astra is built for longer jobs where the user sets a goal and some boundaries, and the model works out the sequence itself.

OpenAI’s demonstrations showed the frontier model handling several unrelated tasks at once. The company presents this as moving past the pattern in which a human supplies the next instruction every time.

That is a real change, and it is the part most users will notice first.

One of the benchmarks show that Astra scored 99.9% on ARC-AGI-3, a test that places an AI agent in unfamiliar interactive games with no instructions and measures how efficiently it works out the rules.

OpenAI estimates that the average human scored 48% when asked to work out the same unfamiliar games. The detail matters here, however. ARC Prize, which runs the benchmark, reported that Astra’s best score through the shared “harness” it gives every model was 62.7%. A harness is a kind of software operating system, or physical environment, within which the AI system works. ARC Prize provides Astra with this software harness.

The 99.9% came from a different harness, built by OpenAI for Astra, which preserves the AI model’s reasoning between requests. Essentially, Astra did better when it was able to reuse previous work and wasn’t “starting from scratch” between requests in terms of its reasoning.

Evaluators disagree

Independent evaluators disagree about how much of an advance GPT-6 Astra represents on its predecessor. The independent research institute Epoch AI places it right at the frontier, alongside other cutting-edge AI models such as Claude Fable 5.1, Kimi K3 and GPT-5.5 Pro. The independent analysis company Artificial Analysis did not rate it as being radically ahead of its predecessor – GPT-5.6 Sol.

Toby Walsh, an AI researcher at the University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia, described the intelligence in frontier AI models such as GPT-6 Astra and others as “still today very jagged”, telling Al Jazeera that there are simple things that even the best AI models do poorly.

On September 8 2026, OpenAI published a claimed solution to the Navier-Stokes problem, one of seven Millennium Prize problems in mathematics. This has often been reported as Astra’s work. It was not. OpenAI says the proof came from an unreleased internal model, significantly more capable than Astra, running roughly 10,000 AI agents (AI models that perform tasks in response to human instructions) in parallel for about 88 hours.

Astra’s contribution was the formalisation and verification afterwards, which took a further 17 hours. The proof has not yet been checked by the mathematical community.

Amodei’s September essay calling for an AI slowdown remains the strongest recent statement about the risks of frontier models. He wrote that within six to 12 months, a swarm of agents could be capable of taking over the internet with a persistent botnet. This could lead to the catastrophic failure of key systems and would cause damage possibly running into hundreds of billions of dollars.

Claude misuse

It is worth examining Amodei’s warnings. Anthropic’s September threat report sets out examples of how AI is already being used in alarming ways.

According to the Anthropic report, a group in northern Yemen recently used Claude code to build guidance software for rockets and a missile. Russian and Chinese operators automated espionage work. A single French-speaking individual built used AI to build a software platform that made personal information about people affiliated with a targeted political movement searchable online. In each case, a human chose the targets and the model supplied the labour.

That is a narrow capability applied at speed and scale under human direction. It is serious, but it is not a description of general intelligence.

Capability and general intelligence are separate things, and they call for different responses. Amodei’s proposed response is to slow frontier development while expanding independent evaluation and coordinating safety standards across countries. A genuinely general system would raise questions that those measures are not designed to answer.

GPT-6 Astra does not settle whether AGI has arrived. Instead, it exposes why that question is becoming harder to answer. Intelligence is increasingly a property of an AI system comprising a model, memory, tools and agents, rather than of a model tested in isolation.

On the narrower question of whether these systems can now cause serious harm, the people running the companies have said plainly that they definitely can.The Conversation

Waqas Ali, Lecturer in Business Management and Research, Faculty of Arts, Business, and Social Sciences, University of Wolverhampton

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

.

.


 

.

 

Professor Wesam Al Asali Reinterprets Traditional Vaulting

Professor Wesam Al Asali Reinterprets Traditional Vaulting

A historic temple in Amman, Jordan, featuring traditional architecture and the national flag. by heba alwahsh via Pexels

.

IE University Professor Wesam Al Asali Reinterprets Traditional Vaulting at Amman Design Week 2026

.

By IE SoAD
Archinect – Oct 26, 2026

.

.

Photo©Edmund Sumner

Photo©Edmund Sumner

 

Wesam Al Asali, architect, professor and reseacher at IE School of Architecture & Design (IE University), has designed Tašbik, a site-specific architectural installation for Amman Design Week 2026, held from October 2 to 17 in Amman, Jordan. The project reintroduces the Mediterranean construction technique of bóvedas tabicadas (thin-tile vaulting) to the Arab region, reinterpreting it through the use of locally sourced Jordanian limestone.

IE University Professor Wesam Al Asali Reinterprets Traditional Vaulting at Amman Design Week 2026 | IE School of Architecture and Design | Archinect

Occupying 256 square meters in Al Mudarraj, the open-air lecture courtyard of Amman Design Week, Tašbik consists of a sequence of stone vaults that serve as seating, a stage, and spatial enclosures. The intervention transforms the courtyard into a gathering space for lectures, public activities, and informal exchanges.

The installation was developed as part of the fourth edition of Amman Design Week, organized under the theme Accumulations, which explores how time, labor, materials, and knowledge contribute to cultural and material practices.

IE University Professor Wesam Al Asali Reinterprets Traditional Vaulting at Amman Design Week 2026 | IE School of Architecture and Design | Archinect

At the center of the project is the reinterpretation of bóvedas tabicadas, a lightweight vaulting technique associated with Mediterranean architectural traditions. By reconstructing the vaults using limestone from Hallabat, Jordan, Al Asali explores how traditional construction knowledge can be transferred and adapted across different geographical and material contexts.

The project also establishes a connection between construction and language. Its name, Tašbik (تشبيك), refers to the Arabic term from which the Spanish word tabicadas is traced, suggesting a relationship between architectural traditions across the Mediterranean and the Arab world.

Conceived as an open workshop, the installation places the construction process at the center of the architectural experience. Its repeated vaulted elements explore accumulation not only as a physical process of assembling materials, but also as a means of transmitting craftsmanship and technical knowledge over time.

The project involved the participation of Anna Isabel Martinez and Yassamin Ghassimi, students at IE School of Architecture & Design, who contributed through the School’s Construction Lab. Architectural drawings and details were developed by Dalaa Al Khadra. Stone fabrication was carried out by Siwan Stone & Marble in Amman, with timber sponsorship from Home Pillar.

Beyond his teaching and researching role at IE University, Wesam Al Asali is co-founder and Director of Design and Innovation at IW-lab and founder of CERCAA (Educational Center for the Regeneration of Craft Construction) in Valencia, Spain. His work explores the relationship between design, material experimentation, and craft-based construction.

Together with architectural historian Nadi Abusaada, Al Asali is also co-editor of Arab Modern: Architecture and the Project of Independence (gta Verlag, 2025), a book that examines the relationship between architecture, nation-building, and cultural identity in the Arab world during the twentieth century. Read more about the book on IE University’s website.

 

 

.


 

.
Qatar Keynote Speaker and Futurist Future Vision

Qatar Keynote Speaker and Futurist Future Vision

A stunning aerial view of the modern skyscrapers in Lusail, Doha, with azure waters in the background. by Brian Candy via Pexels

.

QATAR KEYNOTE SPEAKER AND FUTURIST: BOOK & HIRE FOR CONFERENCE MEETINGS, VIRTUAL EVENTS & WEBINARS

.

.

A top Qatar keynote speaker and futurist helps organizations understand emerging trends, anticipate future developments, and turn new ideas into practical business opportunities. Through engaging presentations on artificial intelligence, digital transformation, leadership, economic diversification, sustainability, and the future of work, the best Qatar keynote speaker and futurist advisors can help audiences prepare for change and develop a forward-looking perspective.

The nation’s investment in digital infrastructure, economic diversification, education, energy, tourism, transportation, and innovation creates opportunities for organizations to explore how emerging technologies and global developments will shape the next decade.

Like celebrity Qatar keynote speaker and futurist advisors point out, from corporate conferences in Doha to executive leadership summits, technology forums, international business gatherings, and industry events, a thought leader can pair global trends with regional ambitions and organizational priorities.

The job links speaking with futures thinking. Any given famous Qatar keynote speaker and futurist communicates ideas in an engaging, memorable format, while futurism examines possible developments, emerging signals, long-term trends, and alternative scenarios. Together, these disciplines help audiences understand what may lie ahead and identify practical ways to prepare.

Organizations can book and hire a global Qatar keynote speaker and futurist to consider artificial intelligence, intelligent cities, the future of energy, digital finance, advanced manufacturing, healthcare innovation, entrepreneurship, sustainable business models, and leadership in an increasingly interconnected world.

This comprehensive guide explains what an SME and KOL does, which topics are most relevant to Qatar, how futurism supports business strategy, which industries benefit from future-focused presentations, how to plan an engaging keynote, and how organizations can translate future-oriented insights into measurable action.

What Is a Qatar Keynote Speaker and Futurist?

A Qatar keynote speaker and futurist is a professional who delivers presentations about the future of business, technology, society, industries, and organizational development, with relevance to audiences in Qatar or international audiences connected to the country.

The keynote speaker establishes a central message for an event, while the futurist examines how current developments could influence future outcomes.

A combined keynote can help participants understand three important dimensions:

  • What is changing: Emerging technologies, market developments, social shifts, customer expectations, and industry transformations.
  • What these changes could mean: The implications for organizations, employees, customers, investors, and communities.
  • What organizations can do today: Strategic decisions, capabilities, investments, and experiments that can prepare businesses for different possible futures.

Futurism is not simply the prediction of a single future. It involves exploring multiple plausible possibilities, identifying early indicators of change, understanding uncertainty, and considering how present-day decisions influence future outcomes.

For example, a keynote about the future of artificial intelligence might examine how intelligent systems could reshape customer service, knowledge work, industrial operations, and decision-making. It could then help participants consider the skills, governance structures, and organizational capabilities needed to use those systems effectively.

A presentation about the future of energy could explore evolving demand, energy efficiency, low-carbon technologies, industrial innovation, and the relationship between energy systems and digital infrastructure.

The purpose is to give audiences a broader perspective while maintaining a clear connection to the decisions they make today.

What Does a Futurist Bring to a Keynote?

A futurist brings structured thinking about change, emerging trends, and long-term possibilities.

This perspective can help audiences move beyond immediate operational priorities and consider how their organizations may evolve over the next five, ten, or twenty years.

A future-focused keynote may incorporate:

  • Emerging technology analysis.
  • Global economic and industry trends.
  • Strategic foresight and scenario planning.
  • Future-of-work insights.
  • Innovation frameworks.
  • Customer and societal trend analysis.
  • Long-term business opportunities.
  • Organizational adaptability.
  • Sustainable development.
  • Practical actions for future readiness.

The presentation may combine research-informed observations, illustrative scenarios, business examples, and thought-provoking questions for the audience.

Its value comes from helping participants connect a broad view of the future with practical organizational choices.

Why Qatar Is an Important Setting for Futurist Keynotes

Qatar offers a compelling context for conversations about the future because its economic and development priorities connect technology, infrastructure, human development, sustainability, and international business.

The country’s long-term development agenda emphasizes economic diversification, innovation, workforce capabilities, environmental sustainability, and improvements in quality of life. These priorities create natural connections with futurism and strategic foresight.

A Qatar keynote speaker and futurist can help organizations examine how these ambitions intersect with global developments and industry-specific opportunities.

Economic Diversification and New Industries

Economic diversification creates opportunities to develop new sources of value across technology, tourism, logistics, manufacturing, financial services, education, healthcare, and other sectors.

A keynote can explore how emerging technologies and changing global markets may influence the development of these industries.

For business leaders, this creates a framework for considering new capabilities, partnerships, customer segments, and investment opportunities.

For entrepreneurs, it can highlight areas where innovative products and services may address emerging needs.

Digital Transformation and Artificial Intelligence

Digital technologies are reshaping the way organizations operate, deliver services, and compete.

Artificial intelligence, automation, cloud computing, data analytics, and connected systems are becoming increasingly important to business strategy.

A futurist keynote can help audiences understand how these technologies may evolve and how their combined effects could transform entire industries.

The emphasis can extend beyond individual tools to the future of organizations, customer relationships, workforce skills, and business models.

Future-Ready Infrastructure

Infrastructure influences how cities function, how businesses operate, and how people access services.

Smart mobility, digital connectivity, intelligent buildings, urban analytics, and integrated transport systems create opportunities for future-focused presentations.

A keynote can explore how infrastructure may become more connected, data-driven, efficient, and responsive to changing needs.

These ideas are relevant to urban development, construction, transportation, logistics, energy, and public services.

Education and Human Capital

The future of work depends on the relationship between technological progress, human capabilities, and lifelong learning.

As AI and automation change professional tasks, organizations must consider how people can develop the skills needed for evolving roles.

A futurist keynote can examine critical thinking, creativity, digital literacy, collaboration, adaptability, and the relationship between human judgment and intelligent technology.

These themes are relevant to business leaders, educators, HR professionals, universities, and workforce development organizations.

Sustainability and Long-Term Prosperity

Sustainability connects economic development with resource efficiency, environmental stewardship, energy innovation, and long-term resilience.

Future-focused presentations can explore how businesses may adapt their operations, products, infrastructure, and supply chains to changing environmental and market conditions.

The goal is to help organizations consider how sustainable practices can contribute to innovation, operational performance, and long-term value creation.

International Business and Global Connectivity

Qatar’s international commercial relationships create opportunities for discussions about global trade, cross-border partnerships, investment, logistics, and international innovation.

A keynote can examine how geopolitical developments, technological change, demographic shifts, and new business models influence global markets.

For organizations with international operations, this perspective supports strategic planning and a broader understanding of the forces shaping future opportunities.

.

Read more on QATAR KEYNOTE SPEAKER AND FUTURIST: BOOK & HIRE FOR CONFERENCE MEETINGS, VIRTUAL EVENTS & WEBINARS


.


 

.