Mapped: The Most Populated Cities in the Middle East

Mapped: The Most Populated Cities in the Middle East

Vibrant night view of Dubai’s modern skyline reflecting on the waterfront.  By Ahsan Elahi via Pexels.

.

Mapped: The Most Populated Cities in the Middle East

.

Published on Visual Capitalist

 

Article/Editing: Bruno Venditti

Graphics/Design: Anna Diederichs

 See more visuals like this on the Voronoi app.

most populated cities in the Middle East

Use This Visualization

Mapped: The Most Populated Cities in the Middle East

This was originally posted on our Voronoi app. Download the app for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.

Key Takeaways

  • Cairo is by far the Middle East’s largest city, with a population exceeding 25 million in 2025.
  • Egypt, Türkiye, Iran, and Saudi Arabia dominate the ranking, reflecting long-term urbanization trends.

The Middle East is home to some of the world’s fastest-growing and most densely populated cities. Rapid population growth, rural-to-urban migration, and economic concentration have driven major cities to expand well beyond their historic cores.

This map highlights the most populated cities in the region in 2025. The data for this visualization comes from the United Nations.

Cairo Stands Alone at the Top

Cairo ranks as the Middle East’s most populated city, with more than 25.5 million residents in 2025. The Egyptian capital has expanded steadily for decades, driven by high birth rates and sustained migration from rural areas. Alexandria and several other Egyptian cities also rank highly.

Türkiye and Iran Anchor Urban Growth

Türkiye places multiple cities in the top 20, led by Istanbul with over 15 million people, followed by Ankara and Izmir.

Iran also features prominently, with Tehran, Mashhad, Isfahan, and several secondary cities reflecting the country’s large population and relatively balanced urban network.

Gulf Cities Punch Above Their Weight

Several Gulf cities appear high on the list despite much smaller national populations. Riyadh, Dubai, Jeddah, Doha, and Kuwait City have grown rapidly over the past two decades, fueled by economic diversification, infrastructure investment, and foreign labor inflows.

While smaller than Cairo or Istanbul, their growth rates remain among the fastest in the region.

Learn More on the Voronoi App 

If you enjoyed today’s post, check out The World’s Wealthiest Nations in 2025 on Voronoi, the new app from Visual Capitalist.

*


 

*

MENA states are increasing focus on South-South cooperation

MENA states are increasing focus on South-South cooperation

 

Image for illustration: A man holds a “One World” sign on the Brooklyn Bridge, symbolizing unity and activism. By Lara Jameson via Pexels

.

MENA states increasing focus on South-South cooperation

.
MENA states increasing focus on South-South cooperation | Arab News

People take documentation at the hall of the Second High-level UN Conference on South-South Cooperation in Buenos Aires. (AFP)

.

Several countries across the Middle East and North Africa have, in recent years, emerged as key players in reshaping global cooperation dynamics, particularly through South-South cooperation. This dynamic process allows developing countries, often historically marginalized in global power structures, to collaborate and share knowledge, resources and expertise. Regional nations are clearly transitioning from simple contributors to central champions of South-South cooperation, challenging the traditional north-south power structures that have dominated global governance for decades.
South-South cooperation aims to foster mutual development and solidarity among nations of the Global South by enabling exchanges of knowledge, technology and resources. The UN Office for South-South Cooperation, established in 1974, has long supported these initiatives, which include knowledge sharing, technical expertise, diplomatic ties and development financing. MENA countries, historically more aligned with the West due to geopolitical interests, are now at the forefront of this global shift, pushing for a more equitable and collaborative approach to global governance.
One of the most striking examples of MENA’s growing role in South-South cooperation is the significant increase in bilateral trade and investments between the region’s countries and other developing regions, particularly Africa and Asia. MENA countries’ economic diversification strategies are shifting their focus from traditional oil and gas revenues to more sustainable partnerships, driven by the desire to reduce reliance on the West.
Countries such as Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar and the UAE have long had national funds for development aid, such as the Saudi Fund for Development and the Kuwait Fund for Arab Economic Development. These have already invested billions into projects across Africa, Latin America and Asia. In fact, between 2011 and 2020, these four Gulf Cooperation Council countries provided more than $81 billion in bilateral official development assistance, with a significant portion aimed at boosting the economic growth of developing regions.
The Kuwaiti fund alone has issued nearly 800 loans and provided more than 230 technical assistance grants across 16 Arab states, supporting infrastructure, healthcare and education projects. In 2023, Saudi Arabia delivered $5.2 billion in official development assistance, including $4.7 billion dedicated to programmable bilateral aid, primarily for infrastructure and support to the least developed countries.

MENA countries are now pushing for a more equitable and collaborative approach to global governance.

Zaid M. Belbagi

In Africa, the scale of MENA’s investments is increasingly evident, as GCC-Africa greenfield foreign direct investment reached 85 projects worth $11.5 billion in 2023 alone. This surge is set to continue, with 73 projects in 2024 committing more than $53 billion, accounting for 6 percent of global FDI, further solidifying MENA’s leadership in South-South cooperation.
The GCC countries have also broadened their multidimensional partnerships with regions such as East Asia and Latin America. A notable example of this is Saudi Arabia’s deepening engagement with China, as the two countries have significantly expanded their cooperation in defense technology, energy diversification and infrastructure development. In 2024, trade between China and the GCC countries exceeded $288 billion, illustrating the scale of this strategic partnership, which now includes joint ventures in areas such as drones and missiles, reducing the region’s reliance on traditional Western defense suppliers.
However, countries across the MENA region are now actively pursuing partnerships that go beyond financial assistance. Morocco, for example, has spearheaded major initiatives aimed at boosting African integration and economic autonomy. The Nigeria-Morocco gas pipeline, designed to address energy needs across West Africa, shows how MENA countries are leveraging their resources to fuel the growth of their southern neighbors.
Qatar, too, is rising as a key player in South-South cooperation, particularly through its diplomatic and financial investments. Qatar’s establishment of the South Fund for Development and Humanitarian Assistance under the Group of 77 highlights its commitment to strengthening multilateral South-South ties. The fund has already been instrumental in supporting development initiatives across several Global South countries.
The UAE has similarly expanded its partnerships with emerging economies, not only in Asia but also in Africa and Latin America. Its Masdar City, a global leader in renewable energy development, provides a model for sustainable energy projects in the Global South, particularly in countries struggling with energy security. The UAE’s growing collaboration with South Korea for technology transfer in defense and renewable energy is another example of how the region is diversifying its partnerships and reducing dependence on Western institutions.
Furthermore, the shifting global order is becoming increasingly evident in MENA’s relationships with regional players such as India and Brazil. In 2024, India’s Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement with the UAE marked a significant milestone in enhancing bilateral trade, with merchandise trade topping $83 billion. The agreement has facilitated trade across multiple sectors, including non-oil commodities, technology and renewable energy.
Despite the growing influence of South-South cooperation, the MENA region is not immune to challenges. To fully capitalize on its emerging role as a champion of South-South cooperation, the region’s countries must continue to strengthen their local capabilities, enhance technological innovation, strengthen diplomatic ties and, most importantly, build robust domestic industries.
These efforts are already evident in countries such as Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Qatar, which are heavily investing in developing their own defense technologies, renewable energy infrastructure and space exploration programs. Through these strategic initiatives, regional champions are leading the charge in shaping a more equitable and decentralized global order.
The region’s leadership in South-South cooperation marks a significant shift in global governance, challenging the traditional north-south divide. With countries in the region increasingly diversifying international partnerships, investing in shared development projects and fostering diplomatic engagement, the region is contributing to the rebalancing of global power structures, offering an alternative to the conditionalities of Western institutions such as the International Monetary Fund and World Bank.
This shift signals growing autonomy for countries in the Global South, where shared development goals and mutual cooperation are becoming the cornerstones of a new international order. The result is a more plural, negotiated and less hierarchical global governance system, in which MENA’s leadership is central to driving an innovative and equitable future for the Global South.

• Zaid M. Belbagi is a political commentator and an adviser to private clients between London and the Gulf Cooperation Council.
X: @Moulay_Zaid

Read the original in https://arab.news/px8na

*


 

*

 

Sustainability trends for 2026

Sustainability trends for 2026

As we approach 2026, sustainability is starting to function more as a core business discipline rather than a standalone initiative. The public, private, and civic sectors are applying sustainability strategies to improve energy efficiency, reduce operating costs, strengthen supply chain resilience, and manage long-term risk — much of which is supported by advances in circularity, modern energy systems, artificial intelligence (AI), and emerging quantum technologies.

But progress requires coordination, credible data, and solutions designed to scale. These needs are increasingly impacting the priorities of our customers and partners, and as a result, are now firmly on the boardroom agenda. And across sectors, organizations are incorporating sustainability decisions into operational and technology decisions in response to changing market conditions and AI-era innovations. Here are the trends we expect to take shape in the year ahead.

  1. Sustainability becomes a more structured and strategic business discipline.

    Organizations are increasingly treating sustainability as a core business priority — integrating energy efficiency, energy security, operational resilience, and circularity into day-to-day operations and long-term planning.

    In parallel, global standards and reporting practices are becoming more aligned — particularly for multinational organizations navigating different rules and requirements. Frameworks such as the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) and the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) are converging toward clearer guidance on sustainability-related reporting. While approaches vary by jurisdiction, disclosure is now common practice among large enterprises. According to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 91 percent of large companies now disclose sustainability-related information.

    At Cisco, sustainability is one component of our business strategy — helping to inform how we design products and build partnerships to improve efficiency, circularity, and system performance. This approach is reflected in our investment strategy as well, including support for innovators such as CorPower Ocean, whose wave energy technologies represent promising new models for reliable, clean power generation.

  2. Circularity advances from recycling to design-led systems thinking.

    Circularity is becoming an integral part of design and operations strategy — shaping decisions across material selection, engineering, manufacturing, and product life cycle planning. Organizations are moving beyond traditional end-of-life recycling and embedding circularity earlier in the design process — reducing waste upfront, extending useful life, and keeping materials in use longer. Emerging tools such as digital twins allow teams to model product life cycles, evaluate material impacts, and plan for reuse before anything is built — making circular design more practical to implement and embed into everyday engineering decisions. At Cisco, we are proud to be at the forefront of this shift. We recently reached our goal of embedding Circular Design Principles into 100 percent of new products and packaging, demonstrating how circularity is becoming a core sustainability capability.

  3. Innovation scales across systems, from secure grid modernization to microgrids.

    After years of pilots, innovation is being deployed more broadly across both large-scale infrastructure and localized solutions — from smart buildings to neighborhood-level microgrids. Public sector modernization programs, rising resilience requirements, and the need for secure, reliable energy systems are accelerating this transition.

    At Cisco, we are supporting this shift through secure, scalable networking and smart building technologies — along with continued investment in energy-efficient design. Cisco Silicon One, for example, delivers industry-leading performance per watt — helping organizations modernize infrastructure with lower energy consumption and greater capacity. These advances enable utilities and communities alike to deploy energy solutions that are more reliable, resilient, secure, and ready for the future.

  4. AI continues to reshape the energy equation.

    As enterprises scale AI workloads, electricity demand is rising. Data center grid demand in the United States alone is forecast to nearly triple by 2030. AI-optimized servers, which currently represent about 21 percent of data center electricity usage, could account for 44 percent by 2030 — placing new demands on secure and resilient energy infrastructure.

    These trends are prompting organizations to rethink efficiency, load management, and the infrastructure required to support AI at scale. Cisco is helping customers prepare for this shift by optimizing networks and operations for greater efficiency, visibility, and security, so that infrastructure is ready to support increasingly complex workloads.

  5. Quantum moves from concept to preparation.

    Quantum computing remains an emerging field, but 2026 marks a shift from curiosity to preparation. Organizations are beginning to plan for quantum-safe networks, next-generation cryptography, and early simulation capabilities that could eventually accelerate advances in materials science, energy systems, and climate modeling.

    The priority now is readiness. That means building infrastructure and security practices that can evolve as quantum technologies mature. Industry partnerships, including Cisco’s collaboration with IBM to develop fault-tolerant quantum systems, reflect early steps toward this future as organizations focus on long-term security, resilience, and trust.

Looking ahead, progress across all these areas will depend on deeper collaboration across industries, governments, and communities, and on technology choices designed for longevity, security, and adaptability. We anticipate that more organizations will integrate sustainability considerations into core planning as they modernize infrastructure and prepare for emerging technologies.

The organizations that lead will be those that integrate sustainability into core planning, modernize infrastructure with intention, and prepare today for the technologies that will shape tomorrow.

At Cisco, we remain focused on enabling that future by reducing environmental impact, strengthening resilience, and helping our customers design systems that are secure, adaptable, and built to perform as demands evolve.

Authors

Avatar

Mary de Wysocki, SVP & Chief Sustainability Officer

Chief Sustainability Office

Sustainability starts with knowledge

Sustainability starts with knowledge

Three people engaging in a discussion about recycling at a blackboard. By fauxels via pexels

.

Sustainability starts with knowledge

By Dr Erik Mackie

a large building with ivy growing on the side of itPhoto by Sofia Puchkova on Unsplash

Leading academics from the University of Cambridge and Lund University came together for an international research conference on Knowledge for Sustainable Development: Breaking Barriers to Climate Solutions.”

The event, held in Lund and online, attracted 277 participants from universities, government agencies, and industry to share insights and accelerate climate action. The conference was co-organised by Lund’s Sustainability Forum and Cambridge Zero.

A small delegation of academics from Cambridge travelled to Lund to participate in the conference in-person.

A globe, a lightbulb, a plant, Justicia. Light blue background. Collage of illustrations.

Setting the Stage for Change

The day opened with a keynote from Prof Lars J. Nilsson (Lund University), who outlined Europe’s deep decarbonisation pathways for carbon-intensive industries such as steel and cement production, and the petrochemical industry.

He highlighted the scale of structural changes required in these hard-to-decarbonise sectors, and the reliance on critical raw materials which are crucial for batteries and other technologies.

Stressing that incremental improvements will not suffice, Nilsson called for bold policy frameworks and technological innovation to drive the transition to net-zero emissions. He also championed the role of international bodies such as the European Scientific Advisory Board on Climate Change, which includes members from both Cambridge and Lund, to provide robust scientific advice for the achievement of the EU’s climate goals.

Asked about research priorities for joint collaborations between Cambridge and Lund, Nilsson listed the top three issues to tackle as: petrochemicals (including plastics), critical minerals, and future power systems for data centres.

 Law and Climate: A Double-Edged Sword

Cambridge’s Prof Harro van Asselt, Hatton Professor of Climate Law in the Department of Land Economy, delivered the second keynote on the evolving role of the law in strengthening climate action.

He explored how legal systems can both enable and obstruct progress on climate action. Law can be part of the solution, for example through legally binding emission targets, but can also be part of the problem, through outdated frameworks that lock in unsustainable practices. Van Asselt also pointed to difficulties in the UN climate negotiations, which are hampered by the consensus-based process and obstructionist behaviour, and struggle to deliver on implementation of mitigation and finance. He urged legal creativity and reform.

“Law is a double-edged sword in that it can hinder or facilitate the climate and energy transition. There is a need for legal imagination to reform unsustainable legal frameworks and strengthen the legal tools at our disposal to pursue deep decarbonisation and build climate resilience.”

Credit: Lund University

Credit: Lund University

Credit: Lund University

Credit: Lund University

New West Bank settlement would make a Palestinian state impossible

New West Bank settlement would make a Palestinian state impossible

Proposed picture of the future: Circle of sneakers on cobblestone pavement representing diversity and urban fashion. by Ingo Joseph via Pexels

.

Israel’s plan for massive new West Bank settlement would make a Palestinian state impossible

Leonie Fleischmann, City St George’s, University of London

Israel OKs settlement project that could divide West Bank : NPR

End of a viable Palestinian state: Israeli finance minister Bezalel Smotrich announces the new development plan. AP Photo/Ohad Zwigenberg

.

The Israeli government has approved a plan for construction of a massive new settlement bloc in the controversial E1 area in the occupied West Bank.

In reviving a project first proposed in 1994, which will comprise about 3,500 new dwellings in a line across the West Bank, finance minister Bezalel Smotrich laid bare the intentions of his government. He declared that “approval of construction plans in E1 buries the idea of a Palestinian state, and continues the many steps we are taking on the ground as part of the de facto sovereignty plan”.


You can listen to more articles from The Conversation, narrated by Noa, here.


E1 (“East 1”) refers to 12 square kilometres of unsettled land east of Jerusalem. It sits inside the boundaries of the third most populous Israeli settlement in the West Bank, Ma’ale Adumim.

In 1975, Israel expropriated 30 sq km of land on which seven Palestinian villages had once stood. Here they built Ma’ale Adumim, one of three Israeli settlement blocs that form an “outer ring” around the Israeli-defined municipal boundaries of Jerusalem.

Israeli authorities refer to these blocs as “facts on the ground”. They were initiated in the West Bank by the Israeli government after the 1967 War to ensure that Israeli population centres were protected from potential attacks.

Today, almost 40,000 Israelis live in Ma’ale Adumim – largely secular Israelis and diaspora Jews who have moved to Israel. Far from the makeshift Israeli outposts that are scattered across the rural West Bank, Ma’ale Adumim was designated a city by Israel in 2015. It is considered by the majority of Israeli Jews to be a permanently protected settlement bloc, which will be retained through land swaps in any final agreement with Palestinians.

The E1 development plan would involve a significant expansion of the existing settlement. All settlement building in East Jerusalem and the West Bank is deemed illegal under international law, but the E1 plans are particularly controversial.

At the heart of the controversy is the viability of a Palestinian state. Israeli construction in E1 would cut the West Bank into two separate parts, rendering it impossible to establish a contiguous Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital.

In addition, according to an objection lodged by the Israeli pressure group Peace Now, Israeli construction in E1 would negatively affect the economic development of a future Palestinian state.

Its objection argues the E1 area is essential for expansion of an urban metropolis necessary for economic growth, and is the only land in East Jerusalem suitable for further development in the Palestinian part of the city. It states that E1 should therefore be left for Palestinian rather than Israeli development.

Political threat

The plan to develop E1 was first proposed in 1994 by Israel’s then-prime minister, Yitzhak Rabin, to make sure Ma’ale Adumim was part of a “united Jerusalem”. This was subsequently reaffirmed by Shimon Peres during his prime ministership in 1996, as part of proposed territorial swaps in the framework of a permanent peace agreement.

In 2005, those plans were frozen after the US administration under George W. Bush told Israel that settlement in E1 would “contravene American policy”.

Map of the West Bank.
The proposed E1 development, linking up with the settlement of Ma’ale Adumim, would make a Palestinian state based on contiguous land in the West Bank impossible.
Honest Reporting, CC BY-SA

The plan was reignited by Israel’s current prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, in 2012, in retaliation for the United Nations’ extension of non-member status to Palestine. But it was then put on hold for eight years due to international pressure.

In 2020, a week ahead of the third national elections held in Israel in a single year, Netanyahu pledged to revive the E1 project, with the hope of securing votes and to court the ultra-nationalist parties into a potential coalition. In 2022, Netanyahu renewed the E1 construction plans, weeks before then-US president Joe Biden was due to visit Israel.

Opposition and support

Each time the plans have been proposed, the decision to advance construction has been met with both internal and international condemnation. On June 9 2023, the planning hearing was “indefinitely” postponed following a call between Netanyahu and Biden’s secretary of state, Antony Blinken.

In response to the most recent announcement to reinstate the plans, the European Union put out a statement expressing concern. It urged Israel “to desist from taking this decision forward, noting its far-reaching implications and the need to consider action to protect the viability of the two-state solution”.

However, Donald Trump now appears to be breaking with the position of previous US administrations. It was recently reported in the Jerusalem Post that the Trump administration supports the reactivation of the development plans. A spokesperson for the US State Department said “a stable West Bank keeps Israel secure and is in line with this administration’s goal to achieve peace in the region”.

Israel’s latest attempt to initiate construction in E1 shows that, while the plans have consistently been delayed, they have never been abandoned. The question is why did Smotrich, with the apparent approval of Netanyahu, make this announcement now?

The answer is most likely that, with the international focus firmly on the continued assault on Gaza, the Israeli government believes it has the breathing space to press ahead with its commitment to building settlements across the West Bank.

Alongside the proposed Israeli takeover of Gaza City, the promise by Smotrich that 2025 would be Israel’s “Year of Sovereignty” – and with it the end of a future Palestinian state – appears to be coming ever closer.The Conversation

Leonie Fleischmann, Senior Lecturer in International Politics, City St George’s, University of London

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

The Conversation